Super Furry Cyclists

It's almost like when 'Baby ate my Eightball' came on then all these people doing crazy things on bikes come out the woodwork.

First up on my way home I see a group of four lads cycling and sharing a joint, passing it from person to person like they are just sat in someone's living room rather than cycling along at 6 O'clock kids and families all about, then I see an old guy, suited up like he's just finished work at Legal and General, cycling along no handed, with his hands folded behind his back pretty much the length of Forest Way. When I get home my (insert name of female relative here) calls and tells me that she's just seen a couple of lads on bikes nick some massive statues out of the neighbours garden and ride off with them. Mad.

Anyway, this last weekend Leicester played host to the Building Cycling Cultures conference. I didn't go, due to various obligations to partner's various obligations to other festivals going on in Leics at the time, but by all accounts it was a good show, attracting folk from all over, including cycling bods from New York.

Anyway, over the weekend (I am told) one of the points of discussion was an article in the Guardian helpfully entitled: On your bike? Not likely...cycling is for children, study finds. (For some reason the online version has a different title, like the Guardian know that online stuff is around for a lot longer so they need to tread more carefully).

The jist of the article (if you can't be bothered to follow the link) is that the majority of the population view bikes as 'children's toys or for lycra clad hobbyists' (these by the way are the Guardian's words, not the study's. There are a few things I find annoying about the way this story is covered in the Guardian:

1. The negative way in which the story is presented - most people won't get past the headline or the first para, so just read the bad bits.

2. The Guardian are normally the biggest cycling advocates - they promote cycling as a means of transport, whereas other papers never mention cycling, or in the Times' case it's a nice thing to do for a Sunday afternoon jolly. I know they have to give a balanced view, but lets face it, they don't normally.

3. The final line is a plug for the Guardian's new book 'Cyclebabble'. They now that only cyclists will be interested beyond paragraph three, becuase by then non-cyclists will be laughing at the lycra clad bit and sniggering. So they get their book in!!!!!! The bloody cheek of it.

I do sincerely hope they are wrong. Studies aside, when I am out and about in Leicester I see the difference - it's visible, there are tons of cyclists on the roads and paths and they are not all wearing lycra. At the weekend we were out and about in Bradgate Park area - we saw people cycling to the pub in Cropston, to the Open Gardens event and to Stonehurst Family Farm in Mountsorrel.

People are cycling in Leicester, and they are loving it!